From the content calendar to the launch checklist to the results dashboard — run every campaign end-to-end in Atwork, with AI to draft and summarize along the way.
The quarter plan was agreed in a deck. Six weeks later half of it has shifted, two unplanned requests took a fortnight each, and nobody can say what the team actually spent its time on.
There is a quarterly plan in a slide deck and a content calendar in a spreadsheet. They agreed in week one. Keeping them agreeing is a job nobody owns, so by mid-quarter only one of them is real.
Sales wants a one-pager, the founder wants a landing page, someone wants the deck updated. Each arrives as a message with no brief, no deadline and no sense of what it displaces.
Copy in a doc, design in a file, the final sign-off in chat. Chasing one approval takes longer than the edit, and the version that shipped is not always the version that was approved.
Spend by channel sits in one place, output in another, results in the analytics tool. Assembling all three for a monthly review takes a day, which is why it happens quarterly at best.
See every post, campaign and asset on a shared calendar the whole team trusts.
Docs and tasks stay connected, so a brief always points at the latest asset and status.
Live dashboards turn campaign data into results you can share with the team and leadership.
Four steps. The second one — a real intake for requests — usually buys back the most time in the first month.
Campaigns, channels and dates as rows, shown on a calendar for the week and a timeline for the quarter. The plan is the calendar, viewed differently, so there is no second document that quietly goes stale.
One form for anyone who wants something from marketing: what, why, when and who it is for. A request arrives complete and takes a place in the queue, rather than jumping it because it was asked in person.
The brief, the draft, the design and the sign-off live on the deliverable. Reviewers comment in place, so the approved version and the shipped version are the same object rather than two files with similar names.
Because campaigns carry channel, budget and status as fields, the monthly view builds itself. What went out, on which channel, at what cost, against what was planned.
Week view for the team, quarter timeline for the leadership update, and a filtered view per channel. Same rows every time, so the version someone screenshots for a meeting cannot be out of date.
Every incoming ask is a row with an owner and a due date. When someone wants their thing moved up, the conversation is about what it displaces — which is a much shorter conversation than the one you have now.
Assign an agent the first draft of a post, a summary of a campaign brief, or the monthly roundup. It works from the real rows, and every run is logged and priced so the AI line is not a mystery.
A plan in slides and a calendar in a sheet
Requests arrive as messages with no brief
Approvals chased across doc, file and chat
Urgent asks jump the queue invisibly
The monthly review takes a day to assemble
One set of rows, two views
One form, complete every time
Sign-off on the deliverable itself
You can see what they displace
It is already on the dashboard
Three starting points that cover planning, publishing and intake.
Yes, and the plan deck with it. Campaigns and content are rows with channel, owner, status and date, shown as a calendar, a timeline or a board. The point is having one source rather than a calendar and a plan that drift apart.
Yes, as guests on the specific views you share, without consuming a paid seat. They see the briefs and deliverables they are working on and nothing else — not budget, not the rest of the calendar.
Not natively today, and we would rather say so than imply otherwise. Results still live in your analytics tool. What this gives you is the output and effort side — what shipped, on which channel, at what cost — which is the half that usually has no system at all.
Add them as guests on the approval view. They comment on the deliverable itself, so the sign-off is attached to the thing being approved rather than sitting in a chat thread nobody can find later.
First drafts and assembly: a post from a brief, a summary of last month's output, a checklist of assets a campaign still needs. Keep the judgement — positioning, messaging, what to prioritise — with the people who understand the market.
For three people running one channel, probably. It starts paying off when requests come from outside the team and more than one person needs to know what is going out next week — usually somewhere around four or five people.
Start free today — invite your team and shape a workspace that fits marketing teams.
Start free